Showing posts with label Evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evolution. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2014

Kent Hovind vs Dr. Matthew Rainbow (Unknown)



So the laptop fund was successful, I've purchased a new laptop and I can begin updating again. So here we have another debate with the creationist felon Kent Hovind verses Dr. Matthew Rainbow. Rainbow has a lot of technical hiccups which takes away from the strength of his presentation, but shows a prodigious amount of patience for the creationist standpoint. He often takes the stance that God could be inserted into the process and denialism of an Old Earth simply doesn't match up with the evidence, but the two ideas are not mutually exclusive.

AUDIO ONLY

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Richard Dawkins - On Evolution (2009)



In light of the recent hiring of creationist promoter Guillermo Gonzalez by Ball State University, creationists have been saying lots of stupid things in defense of the move. This is not Ball State's only questionable move when it comes to science. Another one of their assistant professors is being investigated for promoting intelligent design in a class entitled "The Boundaries of Science". The idea of equal time for teaching both ideas is ludicrous, as well as the idea that somehow Gonzalez is not going to let his beliefs influence his scientific ideas and teachings. We don't teach divine intervention combined with the germ theory of disease in medical schools for a reason. It isn't science and it isn't reconcilable with scientific instruction.

AUDIO ONLY (MP3)

Monday, June 17, 2013

Helen Fisher - Why We Love, Why We Cheat (2007)



Helen Fisher is an anthropologist who studies human behavior, specifically sexual attraction and love. In this particular TED lecture she attempts to view our loves and desires through an evolutionarily and neurological lens. I can hear Michael Shermer's characteristic laugh from the audience near the end of this, perhaps it isn't his, but I enjoy depositing unfalsifiable hypothesizes and presenting them as truth.

AUDIO ONLY (MP3)

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Genie Scott - Evolution and Global Warming Denialism: How the Public Is Mislead (2011)



"Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly. Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate." - 2002 Memo for GOP Canidates
The contention is that since the science isn't settled there's no need to take action. Much as the tobacco companies argued that we don't need warning labels on cigarettes because our scientists say that smoking is harmless. Now the idea of questioning the science is often done through presenting a slate of scientists that support your point of view and certainly the creationists have done this for decades... At any event, even 30,000 scientists is a small fraction of the total number of people receiving degrees in science since approximately the 1970s which would be the cohort that would be being sampled, shall we say. One calculation had it as 3/10ths of 1 percent so the idea that there is this huge ground swell of scientists opposing global warming is, to say the least, overstated.
AUDIO ONLY (MP3)

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution is True and Why Many People Still Don't Believe It (2012)



I've been reading On The Origin of Species which has been inspiring me to post more evolution related lectures and debates. I've read quite a few books on evolution so its interesting to go back to the source. Darwin's work is still highly relevant and engaging so it's been good to revisit it. This post is also a response to the last debate I posted, where the imitable "Dr." Hovind convinced us so effectively of creationism's truth. In other news, my band is leaving for tour today, so posts may get a little spaced out for the next two weeks.

AUDIO ONLY (MP3)

Monday, May 13, 2013

The Great Debate - Kent Hovind vs. Michael Shermer (Creationism vs. Evolution)



This classic debate between Kent Hovind and Michael Shermer pits creationism against evolution as if they were two equally scientific ideas. Creationism, as Shermer repeatedly says in his rebuttals, is not science and not even close to being on equal footing. Just slapping the word science before or after a term does not make it so. We all know and love Shermer (he has some of his hair left in this debate!), founder of Skeptic magazine and author of Why People Believe Weird Things. I decided to look into Kent Hovind and his credentials to which I was immediately ROTFL (excuse my internet vernacular). From his Wikipedia article:
In 1988 and 1991 respectively, Hovind was awarded a master's degree and doctorate in Christian Education through correspondence from the non-accredited Patriot University in Colorado Springs, Colorado (now Patriot Bible University in Del Norte, Colorado, which no longer offers this program).[9] Having a website called "Dr. Dino" has provoked some academics to look closely at how Hovind presents his education and credentials. Chemistry professor Karen Bartelt has said that it is "very unusual for a person with a Ph.D., even a real one, to list oneself in the phonebook as "Dr Hovind", as Hovind has done."[10] [emphasis in original]. Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy, expert on the history of creationism and activist in the creation-evolution controversy, wrote that Hovind's lack of academic training makes it impossible to engage him on a professional level.
Other critics of Hovind have pointed out that Patriot Bible University is a diploma mill, as it has unreasonably low graduation requirements, lack of sufficient faculty or educational standards, and a suspicious tuition scheme.[12][13] The school's current policies allow students to attain bachelor's degrees, master's degrees, and even "Doctor of Ministry" degrees in months, rather than years, for as little as $25 per month. Currently Patriot offers a monthly fee, unlike most universities, which only charge per-credit fees.[14]
Bartelt has stated that Hovind's doctoral dissertation is evidence of the poor requirements at Patriot and that Hovind lacks knowledge of basic science.
Also, most hilarious, since January 2007 "Dr." Hovind has been serving out part of a 10 year prison sentence for a litany of charges.
...after being convicted of 58 federal counts, including 12 tax offenses, one count of obstructing federal agents, and 45 counts of structuring cash transactions. He is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution at Berlin, New Hampshire.
This level of hypocrisy is astounding. It's somewhat reminiscent of the recent wire fraud charges brought against skeptical podcaster Brian Dunning. However Dunning doesn't espouse a hardline stance on biblical morality so I would say his case doesn't display nearly as much duplicity of character.

AUDIO ONLY (MP3)

Monday, April 15, 2013

Micheal Pollan - The Botany of Desire (2001)

Co-evolution is what has shaped modern agriculture, the mass cultivation of plants, animals, and fungus for human sustenance. Our domineering and self-important collective human psyche often puts us as the final arbiters, the Gods of the Garden, beholden only to our own whims. This book attempts to flip this paradigm on its head. We are not the Gods that possess complete domination over life, at least not yet. Nature ultimately is in control (though not an intentioned or conscious control), just as animals and plants in the wild are waging evolutionary warfare on each other - selecting for resistances to chemicals, building exoskeletons against predators, increasing running muscles in carnivorous predators, increasing eye-sight capabilities to see predators, continue ad infinitum - humans are in an unwitting war of desire on the plants we cultivate. We unconsciously and consciously select plants we find useful or desirable while the plants evolve the traits we want because the plants which cater to our needs are more successful, thus their genes are further propagated. The "Gods of the Garden" phrase gives way to the more accurate "Unwittingly Cooperative Caretakers of Plants" or perhaps something equally as awkward and verbose. Throughout the book, Pollan continually connects the assumed messianic paradigm with Greek polytheism, where Gods represented different facets of life. In a simple dichotomy, Pollan separates plants to appeal to Apollonian order or Dionysian frivolity.

Apples were introduced into North America by European colonists and part of what has made them so successful is their adaptability. Apples are examples of extreme "heterozygotes", rather than expressing the the DNA of their parents in a straightforward manner (with slight mutations), apples exhibit significantly different characteristics than their progenitors. Agriculturally, apples are grown exclusively through asexual grafting with sexual seed reproduction occurring only in wild apple trees. Currently, there are still a wide variety of cultivated apple breeds and this is due precisely to their extreme genetic variability. There are 7,500 different apple cultivars with around 25 varieties grown in commercial agriculture. Apple trees grown in a cloned orchard are more prone to disease than wild varieties due to their reduced genetic fitness.  Therefore, the work of staving off harmful fungus and other such maladies falls to us, the caretakers of our genetic creations. According to Pollan, our agricultural domestication of apples has gone too far. Reduced to a few handfuls of commercially cultivated cloned varieties, the natural genetic fitness of apples has been compromised. While our genetic clones are stuck in an evolutionary limbo--pests, fungus, bacteria, and insects are forever evolving and eventually, with the right combination of genes, they're going to win.

The tulip represents the ultimate quintessential flower. Simplicity, color, and beauty with an abstractness of emotions. Tulips are for kids, states Pollan, they are simple to draw and visually uncomplicated. They are the least Dionysian of flowers, their form being extremely ordered and perhaps their visual simplicity doesn't lead to overt passionate emotions. The "tulipomania" in Holland during the 1600s was a savage uprooting of the tulip's unemotional nature, people were willing to sell their homes for the mere promissory note of future tulips. As the market spiraled out of control, with tulips being sold for obscene prices, the most sought after prize was the "break"--tulips that had a streak of contrasting, passionate color across their uniformed simplicity. These broken tulips were rare and for unknown reasons at the time, created less progeny. In the 1920s, scientists discovered that broken tulips were caused by a virus which actually weakened the vitality of the plant. This throws natural selection against a brick wall, as humans were artificially selecting for a visual trait which actually made the plant sickly and diseased. From the point of view of the tulip, the human relationship was detrimental, but from the point of view of the aphids that spread the virus, this was pure evolutionary genius.

Marijuana represents the pure Dionysian plant. Visually ugly but contained within its flowers are powerful intoxicants. Human cultivators have morphed this highly adaptable weed into plants of pure delight, eliciting ever higher concentrations of THC content. With modern techniques, the marijuana plant can be forced to overproduce and does so quite willingly. Pollan describes his own misadventures with growing marijuana in his garden, from germinated seed to the eventual paranoid and frantic uprooting of his plants. Pollan then attempts to place an intoxicating plant in terms of evolution. How did THC first manifest? Pollan lays out his best theories (although since he is not an evolutionary botanist, his hypothesis seems perhaps half-baked) and tries to place the reasons for humans seeking out intoxication within an evolutionary context. Drugs can induce feelings of "transcendence" and Pollan begins to speculate (with some scientific backing) about the purpose of memory loss and normal functioning. Our brains are sensory input machines that are under constant assault from the outside and without a memory loss function, we would be quickly overwhelmed with our sensory memories. THC has been shown to effect short term memory quite substantially and endocannabinoids are produced naturally by the body which activate cannabinoid receptors in the brain. As far as what exactly that means, scientists are still unsure but cannabinoid receptors are similar in function to monoamine neurotransmitters (such as acetylcholine and dopamine) but vary in some respects.

The potato is, even more than the apple, proof of our strong influence over the evolution of plants. Wild potatoes are toxic, inedible, and without our evolutionary influence we would not be eating them. In the case of some potatoes, this control combined with modern technology enables us to force whatever evolutionary design we see fit in almost unimaginable ways. Pollan writes about his personal experiences with NewLeaf genetically modified potatoes by Monsanto. Engineered to be resistant to the Colorado beetle, Pollan's NewLeafs grew with fervor. He marveled at their perfection, their supreme triumph over nature. Removed from the market due to pressure from the anti-GMO lobby (mostly against McDonald's, one of the largest buyers of potatoes in the United States), Pollan expressed irrational fear against eating his modified potatoes. He left them sitting on his porch in a plastic bag, unable to be sliced for a conscious-free potato salad.

To provide my final thoughts, overall I felt like while being an entertaining read, this book is not a science book and it undoubtedly isn't intended to be. Though Pollan shows an understanding of evolution, he does a fair bit of simplification and speculation. I appreciate Pollan's ability to not blindly pander to the naturalistic fallacy. When he is critical of agricultural pesticides and GMOs he's not doing it in an unintelligent way--he provides evidence and counterpoints to his ideas. He seems like what a journalist should be, somehow in the middle of two opposing ideas: modern technological agriculture and pure organic agriculture, himself wrestling between the two (though he obviously leans towards pure organic). Our ideas of agriculture run between two diametrically opposed schools of thought. In my opinion, this is a false dichotomy. The way to solve our agricultural crisis lies somewhere in the middle of the two. I like to think that Pollan agrees with me.

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Michael Pollan - A Plant's-Eye View (2013)


My alternate reading material, besides Christopher Hitchens' Arguably, is Michael Pollan's The Botany of Desire.  Being the reader that I am, I'm unable to merely read one book at a time and I have different books stored in different places.  Its also nice switching off from Arguably because it's a collection of short essays (I love short stories and collections of essays because it's great for switching between books without getting lost when picking it back up after any length of time) and Hitchens is an extremely literate/heavy writer.  I suppose I never really understood his level of literary and historical knowledge until I started reading his journalistic essays.  Anywho, I digress, The Botany Of Desire is a book that examines the human relationship with four different plants from the perspective of evolution.  It turns the idea of artificial selection on its head, the plants unconsciously make us their gene propagators and in return they give us the traits we desire.  There are even a few jabs at the naturalistic fallacy that Pollan sneaks in here and there (which I wasn't expecting).  Pollan has a firm grasp on the general concepts of evolution and also writes in an entertaining and easily digestible manner which makes it an entertaining read.  I will report further when I have consumed more of the book, until then here is his TED talk which explores some of the general concepts.

AUDIO ONLY (MP3)